achieve international sporting success by building specialized facilities 雅思写作运动类7分范文
这篇雅思写作大作文要求大家探讨为了取得国际体育赛事的胜利而为职业运动员修建专门的体育场馆是否合适。积极方面，我们可以强调体育比赛金牌能够提升国家的凝聚力和爱国情绪，以及专门的体育场馆在此过程中发挥的作用。消极方面，我们可以聊聊国家财政的不公平分配，以及民众整体身体素质的下降。
雅思写作运动类题目
Some countries achieve international sporting success by building specialized facilities only for the training of top athletes, instead of providing facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
一些国家为了取得国际体育赛事方面的成功，为顶尖运动员修建了专门的设施，而非提供每个人都能够使用的场馆。你认为这是种积极的发展还是消极的发展？
雅思写作大作文范文
开头段
Heavy investment in sports facilities aimed at professional athletes is common in countries that want to compete in international events. This is a positive development for national pride but negative on the whole as it takes funding away from the average citizen.
为专业运动员投入大量资金修建运动设施在一些想要赢得国际比赛的国家中十分常见。这对于国家荣耀而言十分有用，但因为它挪用了普通市民本应享有的资金，因此整体上是消极的。
体育赛事成功的好处
Proponents of this practice would argue that it brings the nation together. The best examples of this relate to international competitions like the summer and winter Olympics. China and the United States have famously invested millions in building sports facilities for prospective Olympians and the results in terms of medals justify the expenditure. The wider implications for national unity come from an entire country watching the telecasts and rooting together. Divisive domestic disputes are temporarily forgotten as everyone focuses on the progress of their country. Much of this would be impossible without specialised sports facilities for the best competitors.
这一做法的支持者认为它能够将国家团结起来。其最好的案例与诸如夏季和冬季奥运会这样的国际比赛有关。中国和美国投资百万为有潜力获奖的奥林匹克运动员修建运动设施，而奖牌的结果也使得这些花费合理化。整个国家一起观看电视转播有助于民族团结。可能引起分裂的内部争论被暂时抛之脑后，因为每个人都在关注他们国家的进步。而如果顶尖运动员没有专业运动设施的话，这一点很难实现。
专门场馆的坏处
However, these facilities benefit a select few over the majority. Funding for such facilities is a limited part of a federal budget that must cover essential areas like health, education, and the military. Any money diverted towards preparing world-class athletes for international competitions is to some extent a waste as it cuts into the budget for facilities for average people. For example, many inner-city youths in poorer neighbourhoods lack access to parks and such facilities and this has been identified as one of the factors that allows for poverty to be inherited over generations. Direct the funding away from these expensive gyms for top athletes and it would be possible to build many more facilities that serve a much wider and underserved segment of the population.
然而，这些设施只使少部分人获益，而忽略了大部分人。修建这些设施的资金来自于十分有限的国家预算，而这些预算还需要涵盖诸如健康、教育和军事这样的关键领域。任何用于帮助世界级别的运动员备战国际比赛的资金在某种程度上来说都是浪费，因为它导致服务于普通民众的资金的减少。例如，许多城市贫困区域的年轻人无法享受公园一类的设施。而这被认为是贫穷在一代代人之间延续的因素之一。将资金从顶尖运动员所享有的昂贵体育馆上挪走，这样就能够建造更多的，服务于更广泛的贫困人口的设施。
结论
In conclusion, despite the less tangible benefits to national cohesiveness, this is a negative in general as it favours a talented minority. More resources should be allocated towards facilities for those in greater need.
总的来说，尽管在国家凝聚力方面有切实的好处，但这大体而言是消极的，因为它偏向于少部分拥有天赋的群体。更多的资源应该被用于为那些贫困的人修建设施。
点击查看其他雅思写作历年真题范文
