当前位置: 首页 > 雅思口语Part3答案 > 正文

当你在说完有关人物相关的话题卡,尤其是谈到家人,亲戚朋友或者代沟之类的问题,那么考官极有可能会问道如下一些问题 […]

老烤鸭雅思口语限量答案请联系小助手微信号:laokaoyaielts

当你在说完有关人物相关的话题卡,尤其是谈到家人,亲戚朋友或者代沟之类的问题,那么考官极有可能会问道如下一些问题。我们来看看该如何作答。

If you were a parent and you were busy at work, would you take care of your children on your own or hire a babysitter?

如果你身为父母并且工作很忙,你会自己照顾还是还是找一个保姆呢?

-If I was a very busy parent who doesn’t have enough time to take care of my children, I would definitely have them taken care of. I don’t think my parents would be the perfect ones to take care of my children. Because I always complained the traditional Chinese way of looking after the kids when I became an adult. You know, this article is from Laokaoya website, giving little freedom to the kids in case they are in danger, or little creative games that might possibly improve their talents. So, I would probably hire a professional, for example, a babysitter to mentally and physically take care of them.

如果我是一个很忙的家长,几乎没有时间照顾小孩的话。我肯定会请人来照顾他们的。不不认为我的父母能更好的照顾到小孩,因为当我成年之后总觉得父母的那套中国传统的育儿方式不太好。总是不能给小孩应有的自由空间,也没有什么太多创意的游戏来开发他们的才能。所以,我会请一位专业人士来照看小孩,比如保姆同时从心理和身体上把他们照顾好。

-Do you think it is fair to let mothers take care of children all the time?

你觉得由一直由母亲来照顾孩子公平吗?

– I don’t think it’s quite fair to let mothers take care of the kids. I am a person who is extremely against the idea of letting kids’ mothers act as the main role of taking care of themselves not only because of heavy burn but also their mothers’ a lack of improving early childhood education if not supported or communicated with other professionals or even their husbands. Also, don’t you think it’s a good idea to let the one who is more capable to take care of them instead of following the traditional mothers being the housewife type custom?

我不太认为母亲照顾还是是一件公平的事情。我极力反对让母亲变成主要照顾孩子的人。这不仅仅是因为母亲可能会有更大的负担,更多的是,如果母亲不同小孩子的爸爸去交流,那么教育小孩的理念是不能得到进步的。另外,父母只要哪位更有照顾小孩的能力就让哪位来做这件事情,你不觉得这样更好一些吗?

查看更多雅思口语Part3答案

老烤鸭雅思公众号
本文固定链接: http://www.laokaoya.com/2117.html | 老烤鸭雅思-专注雅思备考

雅思口语part 3有关Parents父母的问题准备:等您坐沙发呢!

发表评论

快捷键:Ctrl+Enter
error: Alert: Content is protected !!